Shamanism:
An Old Skill for a New Age
by Sharon Van Raalte
It is a word we hear a lot these days – but just what is
shamanism? The word “shaman” derives from Siberia
and Central Asia, from the Tungusc “saman”. The term
has been applied widely to refer to those experiences best described
in Mircea Eliade’s classic work, Shamanism: Archaic
Techniques of Ecstasy. Eliade calls shamanism a “technique
of ecstasy”, not to be confused with other forms of magic,
sorcery or even experiences of religious ecstasy.
Michael Harner,
Founder and Director of the Foundation for Shamanic Studies, calls
shamanism a method and a practice, as opposed to a religion based
on fixed dogmas. It is a way for individuals to experience and
interact with a universe where everything is alive, interconnected
and moving according to some hidden purpose.
Shamanism has
its roots in ancient, land-based cultures, dating at least as
far back as 40,000 years. The shaman was known as “magician,
medicine man, psychopomp, mystic and poet” (Eliade, 1974).
What set him apart from other healers or priests was his ability
to move at will into trance states. During a trance, the shaman’s
soul left his body and travelled to other realms, where helping
spirits guided him in his work. The shaman provided healing on
many levels; physical, psychological and spiritual. The work of
the shaman was based on the holistic model, which took into consideration,
not only the whole person, but that person’s interaction
with his world, both inner and outer. The soul was considered
the place of life breath, where essence resided, and any physical
illness was inextricably linked with sickness of the soul. Illness
of the mind had to do with soul loss, intrusion, possession.
Through time,
tribal hunter-gatherer groups coalesced into agricultural communities.
Then, people moved into towns which became cities, and eventually
social structures became hierarchical. These vast social changes
brought about profound changes in the world view of those who
were no longer land-based, and altered their relationship to nature,
to spirit and to the healing arts. The shaman, as healer/priest
of the earth-based traditions, was perceived as a threat to the
leaders of organized religion. A nascent medical profession chose
to restrict healing knowledge to an elitist group who were schooled
in classical practices. Earth wisdom was disavowed. This paradigm
has continued more or less unbroken up to the present and has
given us the models of organized religion, allopathic medicine
and contemporary psychiatry/psychology.
The ancient holistic
model of the shaman has become splintered into specialties. Modern
religion defines a relationship with God that is often filtered
through dogma and sectarianism. Modern medicine focuses on the
body as a grand machine, and the territory of the modern psychiatrist
is the mind. Even though I have the notion that the psychiatrist,
in some respects, is replacing the spiritual confessor, as organized
religion seems less able to fill the needs of many people, I would
guess that for many psychiatrists, spirit is less an issue than
mind.
In the first years
of the 21st century an emerging paradigm shift is coming into
focus, spiraling us back to considerations of the soul and the
spirit. The need in our culture for a more direct spiritual context
and the desire for a sense of wholeness and connectedness is evident
in the current shift towards mystical and earth-based holistic
practices. Through eastern meditation, bodywork, Gaia consciousness,
and the revival of indigenous wisdoms (e.g native North American,
Celtic), for example, we are really attempting to find a footing
on something of substance. We are looking for original wisdom.
In this age of demystification, we are searching for the mystery.
Perhaps a brief
look at the history of shamanism will shed light on the reasons
for the current revival of this and other spiritual or animistic
approaches to healing.
Accounts of shamanic
practices reveal a long and continuous line of shamanic tradition
that, rather than being lost, has been overshadowed in the West
by a three hundred year preoccupation with rational and mechanistic
thinking. During this time, earth-based wisdoms were discredited
in favour of the prevailing scientific and technological paradigm.
Native American shamanic counsellor, Leslie Gray, refers to the
“devolution…from shamanism to mesmerism to hypnotism
to psychoanalysis” during the “handful” of years
(Yoga Journal, 93, 1990,p.53).
Holger Kalweit,
combining the study of psychology and ethnology, has investigated
shamanism from both of these perspectives:
The
“perverse” upside-down physics of the shamanic
universe – in which time is stretchable, space is solid,
matter is tranparent, and conventional manifestations of energy
are replaced by invisible subtle forces – cannot be
grasped by our customary mode of perception. Nevertheless,
all our tribal societies as well as our ancestors –
and cultures of both the Old World and our present world –
did at one time subscribe to the idea of such a universe.
Our modern Western culture forms the only exception to this
general rule. Its determined scientific exploration and experimentation
has confined itself to what is observable within three-dimensional
space. In other words, it has concentrated itself exclusively
on a reality accessible to a system of logic based on purely
sensory perceptions (Kalweit, 1984, translation 1988, pp.
xi-xii). |
|
This
mind-set has exacted a heavy toll on the integrity of the earth
and its inhabitants. Some contemporary philosophers and historians,
such as Thomas Berry, believe that we have carried this period
to its “logical” conclusion and that our planetary
survival depends on our rediscovering or re-membering the context
that once informed the larger segment of our history as human
beings on this earth. In his book with Brian Swimme, The Universe
Story, Berry refers to the “feeling for subjective communion
with the various components of the Earth community” as demonstrated
in the drawings and paintings of animals done in Paleolithic times.
Unlike the “taking without giving in return” that
characterizes our present attitude towards the earth, in those
early times
…everything
existed within the single embrace of this immense world where
the primordial mysteries of existence were shared in common.
In the early civilizations the cosmological order was consistently
experienced in terms of human society, and human social order
was conceived in terms of the cosmological order. These were
different aspects of a single universal order of things. (Berry
and Swimme, 1992, pp. 244-245). |
|
In
order to return to this level of human awareness in a new context,
Berry invites us to find a “mystique of exaltation”
through “the renewal of the great cosmic liturgy”.
Rather than seeking to reject the present and return to some past
glory, we are being offered the challenge of participating in
the creation of an elegant synthesis of the reasoning mind and
the passionate heart – one that will take us forward in
our evolution.
The historical
path that has brought us to this point can be traced if we look
at the evolution of shamanic traditions. Joseph Campbell provides
insight into the nature of the shamanic way of being when he addresses
the question of the contrasting mythologies of the hunting and
planting tribes. In hunting societies, success depended on the
prowess or power of the individual hunter, which was believed
to be accorded to him through visionary encounters with beings
in the spirit world.
He describes that,
by taking even one step up the evolutionary ladder of society,
to the planting tribes, the group was already faced with a complexity
of structure that required putting individual initiative aside
in favour of “a rigid relationship not only of the individual
to his fellows, but also of village life to the calendric cyle”
(Campbell, 1959-69, p. 230). Direct communication with the spiritual
source was replaced with elaborate ceremonies and rituals, conducted
by a professional priesthood, in which the whole community participated.
The
contrast between the two world views may be seen more sharply
by comparing the priest and the shaman. The priest is the
socially initiated, ceremonially inducted member of a recognized
religious organization, where he holds a certain rank and
functions as a tenant of an office that was held by others
before him, while the shaman is one who, as a consequence
of a personal psychological crisis, has gained a certain
power of his own. The spiritual visitants who came to him
in vision had never been seen before by any other; they
were his particular familiars and protectors (Campbell,
1959-69, p. 231). |
|
As
interdependent groups evolved into village, then city structures,
it became ever more important to discredit and stifle the individual
impulse that set shamans on journeys of personal discovery, in
favour of group-enhancing rites. And now, in this age of “professional
priesthoods”, at the height of the most complex societal
structure the world has ever known, we are seeing a renewal of
the shamanic calling, of mystical thinking and the return to a
consideration of ancient wisdoms. We are experiencing a need for
“spirit”.
All cultures have
grown from a place of shamanic awareness, even if it barely remembered.
We have all sprung from tribal and animistic roots. Those roots
are calling to be remembered. We have just to look at the renewal
of Native North American spirituality and practice, the memory
of it still warm in the hearts of the elders and the ancestors.
At pow-wows and in healing circles across the continent, the hand
of friendship and teaching is also being offered to those of us
whose memories are more distant.
Michael Harner
is one of the most respected voices in the field of contemporary
shamanism. An anthropologist with impeccable academic credentials,
he was also trained in shamanism by both the Conibo and Jivaro
Indians. His lifelong investigation into the ways of shamanism
around the world led him to develop a synthesis of universal shamanic
wisdom, called core shamanism, that can be learned and practiced
with high levels of success by Westerners in a Western setting.
The sense of something
missing has expanded from the spiritual to include the physical
and emotional. In this vein, Harner sites a dissatisfaction with
the inadequacies of purely technological treatments of illness,
along with the impersonal and commercial aspects of much of modern
medicine, as another reason people are seeking more.
He points to aspects
of alternative medicine, which seem to be bringing back into use
many of the techniques that have long been associated with shamanism,
“such as visualization, altered states of consciousness…hypnotherapy,
meditation…and the mental and emotional expression of personal
will for health and healing” as an indication that “shamanism
is being reinvented in the West precisely because it is needed”
(Harner, 1980, p. 136).
One of the first
and most important teachings in shamanic work is that our real
masters are our guides and teachers in the spirit world. We can
access these realms using techniques which come to us from various
shamanic cultures. Learning these techniques is fascinating. We
can learn, as well, from important teachers in this reality who
have tread the ground before us. But, in the end, how we get there
is not as important as what we learn once we are there. The truth
is, we all learn “one on one” by journeying to our
own helping spirits for answers and teachings. In essence, this
is the purpose of the vision quest and other forms of contemplative
isolation that characterize most shamanic traditions.
In his book, The
Way of the Shaman, Harner suggests some reasons for the return
of shamanic practice. What he describes is a natural outcome of
the growth and waning of cycles. During the Age of Faith, if ecclesiastical
dogma affirmed a spirit world, that was enough to ensure belief
in it. Ironically, the Age of Science, with its worship of the
scientific method, created in its offspring, seekers who require
first-hand evidence of “the nature and limits of reality”.
For many, dogma is no longer sufficient.
Jeremy Taylor’s
words on the subject are insightful.
The
true shamanic tradition is open and adventurous. It is more
conscious, complex, and multidimensional than ordinary “rational”
dealing with life, not less. It is a practical world view
that acknowledges the archetypal patterns of the collective
unconscious as pragmatic realities. It embraces the vision
and the dream as practical means of communion with real
energies greater than the ego. The true shaman, in non-technical
societies as well as in modern industrial settings, is always
more open to new technologies and ways of doing things,
new social relationships, and new ways of framing and conceptualizing
experience than his or her more conventional neighbors.
True shamanic exploration is the exact opposite of “superstition”
because it always remains open and non-dogmatic, regularly
searching beyond the known and the socially agreed and accepted,
not acknowledging conventional wisdom as the limit of the
possible (Taylor, 1992). |
|
In
this respect, shamanism is truly an old skill for a new age.
RECOMMENDED READING:
Campbell, J. (1969).
Primitive Mythology. New York: Penguin Books.
Cowan, T. (1993). Fire in the Head . New York: Harper Collins
Publisher
Eliade, M. (1964). Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy. Princeton,
N.J.; Princeton University Press.
Gray, L. (1990). Altered States Revisited. Article by D. Patrick
Miller, Yoga Journal, Issue 93, p. 53.
Harner, M. (1990). The Way of the Shaman. San Francisco: Harper
& Row.
_________. (1987). The Ancient Wisdom in Shamanic Cultures. In
S. Nicholson (Ed.), Shamanism 3-16. Wheaton Ill: Quest.
Ingerman, S. (1991). Soul Retrieval. San Francisco, CA: Harper
San Francisco.
_________. (1993). Welcome Home. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Kalweit, H. (1988). Dreamtime and Inner Space: The World of the
Shaman. Boston: Shambala Publications, Inc.
Swimme, B. and Berry, T. (1992). The Universe Story. New York:
Harper Collins.
Taylor, J. (1992). Where People Fly and Water Runs Uphill. New
York: Warner Books, Inc.
Sharon
Van Raalte holds an M.A. in Transpersonal Psychology from the
Institute of Transpersonal Psychology in Palo Alto, CA and has
been a student of shamanism for many years. She is presently on
the teaching faculty of the Foundation for Shamanic Studies and
also conducts workshops on themes of nature wisdom in Ontario
and Quebec.
|
|